×

You are using an outdated browser Internet Explorer. It does not support some functions of the site.

Recommend that you install one of the following browsers: Firefox, Opera or Chrome.

Contacts:

+7 961 270-60-01
ivdon3@bk.ru

Methodological approaches to assessing the quality of development of work projects

Abstract

Methodological approaches to assessing the quality of development of work projects

Gaido A.N.

Incoming article date: 18.12.2023

The article discusses methodological approaches to assessing the quality of work projects (WPP). Based on an analytical review of modern scientific articles and regulatory documentation, it is shown that PPR is subject to a significant amount of uncoordinated requirements, both in terms of content and the availability of approvals for various conditions of construction sites. At the same time, projects are increasingly of a formal nature, the quality of technological solutions is decreasing, and third-party developers, so-called freelancers, are involved in their preparation. In this regard, the goal of the research work is formulated in the form of developing a methodology for analyzing the quality of PPR. Based on the analysis of various methodological approaches, it was established that it should be based on the assessment of various indicators obtained from projects drawn up for the conditions of specific construction sites, design features of buildings and structures being erected, etc. It is shown that the assessment of PPR should be carried out on the basis of a single, measurable, comprehensive criterion, which includes the following factors: ensuring safe working conditions at the construction site and the integrated safety of construction processes for the surrounding buildings; compliance with technological discipline requirements; compliance of the technology used with the specific conditions of the construction site; sufficient completeness of the project, completed on the basis of the requirements of regulatory documents. It is proposed to translate qualitative information characterizing these factors into quantifiable indicators based on their analysis using general definition tables.

Keywords: organizational and technological documentation, work project, quality, efficiency, general definition tables, incoming documentation control