You are using an outdated browser Internet Explorer. It does not support some functions of the site.

Recommend that you install one of the following browsers: Firefox, Opera or Chrome.


+7 961 270-60-01

  • The internal structure of political attitudes by students of Grozny (according 2015)

    The work was performed on the experimental data obtained by questionnaires in mid-2015 among the students of the Grozny state oil technical University. All were interviewed 107 people. This sample was typical for the University on basic social indicators. The questionnaire consisted of two blocks, "of cognitive" and "affective" characters. The parameters of the perception of power, the level of protest, involvement in political processes (a total of 14 signs) were identified by a direct survey In the first part. Parallel hierarchical factor analysis conducted on these grounds. On the first level five independent parameters are identified. They are indices of socio-political expectations, the legitimacy of power, declared and observed political activities and assessment of the political situation. On the second level all of them are reduced to two factors. They define the General political activity and cognitive component perception of political power. The work gives the distribution function, all identified factors that characterize the structure of the cognitive components of political attitudes. On the second level indexes of emotional perception of local and Central political orders received in the affective section of the questionnaire are added to them. All the set of factors of the first and second level fully describes the various aspects of conflict, as reflected in the questionnaire.

    Keywords: students, Grozny, questionnaire, semantic differential, a direct survey, the cognitive component of the conflict potential, parallel hierarchical factorization, emotional, political order, matrix, distribution function, multivariate analysis

  • Analysis of emotional perception the political order by Grozny's students in 2015.

    This article presents the results of psychosemantic modeling emotional perception a political order among students of Grozny in 2015. The study involved 107 people, of which 70% - 30% of men and women. The basis of modeling - the technology of semantic differential Charles Osgood. The comparative analysis of average semantic portraits was carried out. Calculated levels of emotional perception of the political order in the linear approximation. It is received, perception of a political order in the Republic - 0,722, across Russia as a whole - 0,402. Further, in a nonlinear approximation in the theory of catastrophes were found adjusted data: in the Republic of - 0.770, Russia - 0.512. It is shown, the perception political a lock is in a stable positive level and found dynamics of increase in the emotional relation compared to previous studies.

    Keywords: political order, semantic differential, factor analysis, the emotional component, questioning, catastrophe theory, the theory of an ideal point

  • Socio-political attitudes of student youth of Grozny at the beginning of 2015

    The results of a direct survey, conducted among students GGTU in early 2015. Were interviewed 107 people. The sample was typical in terms of social indicators for the University. Students showed a high level of their social and economic security. Average group values of these parameters of 3.09 and 2.85 , respectively. And evaluation of their life prospects even higher, of 3.69 (here and below all results are given on a scale from 0 to 5).Indicators of involvement in political life is a little lower. The average levels of engagement and participation in policy 2.05 and 2, 35, comments - 2,31. In this case, the respondents show on average strong positive political mood. Levels of agreement with the decisions of authorities and the recognition of their fair policies and the 3.23 or 3.28. Assess the situation in the Republic and in Russia as a whole and 3,04 3,24. The obtained regularities are confirmed not only on group but also on individual levels. Show that the distribution function of indicators of the respondents also cited in the work.

    Keywords: questionnaires, cognitive performance, direct survey, socio-economic security, inclusion, political life, assessment, consent, the decision of the authorities, the political situation, the average of the group, the distribution function